Дипломная
Предпринимательство и право
Финансы, кредит
Going Private in UK and US. Differences and Similarities ...-
Going Private in UK and US. Differences and Similarities in Strategy, Process and Legal Regulations
Оцененный!
Nr. | Название главы | Стр. |
Table of Contents | II | |
List of Abbreviations | V | |
1. | Introduction | 1 |
1.1 | Definition | 2 |
1.2 | Difference between Going Private and Going Dark | 3 |
1.2.1 | Definition of Going Dark | 3 |
1.2.2 | Over-the-counter Markets in the U.S. and the U.K. | 4 |
1.2.3 | Similarities and Differences between Going Private and Going Dark | 7 |
2. | Trends: IPO’S Vs. Going Private | 9 |
3. | Going Private Activity in the U.S. and U.K. | 11 |
3.1 | The History of Public to Private Activities | 11 |
3.1.1 | U.S. Public to Private Activity | 11 |
3.1.2 | UK Public to Private Activity | 12 |
3.1.3 | Continental European Public to Private Activity | 12 |
3.2 | Companies that went private in the last few years | 15 |
3.3 | The Sarbanes Oxley Act affecting the U.S. Going Private Activity | 16 |
3.4 | Corporate Governance Guidelines in the U.K. | 19 |
4. | Candidates for Going Private Transactions | 22 |
5. | Reasons for Going Private | 23 |
6. | Benefits of Going Private | 24 |
7. | Risks of Going Private | 26 |
8. | Transactions to Reduce Shareholders | 27 |
8.1 | A Cash Out Merger | 28 |
8.1.1 | Statutory Merger | 28 |
8.1.2 | Stock Acquisition | 29 |
8.1.3 | Different Company Structures | 30 |
8.1.3.1 | Horizontal Mergers | 30 |
8.1.3.2 | Vertical Mergers | 30 |
8.1.3.3 | Conglomerate Mergers | 30 |
8.1.4 | Mergers in the U.S. | 31 |
8.1.5 | Mergers in the U.K. | 31 |
8.2 | A Tender Offer | 32 |
8.2.1 | Tender Offers in the U.S. | 33 |
8.2.2 | Tender Offers in the U.K. | 34 |
8.3 | A Reverse Stock Split | 34 |
8.4 | Management Buyouts and Leverage Buyouts | 35 |
8.4.1 | Management Buyout | 35 |
8.4.2 | Leveraged Buyout | 35 |
9. | Delisting | 36 |
9.1 | General Information | 36 |
9.2 | Delisting in the U.S. | 37 |
9.2.1 | Definition of the New York Stock Exchange | 37 |
9.2.2 | Delisting at the New York Stock Exchange | 37 |
9.3 | The NASDAQ | 38 |
9.3.1 | Definition of the NASDAQ | 38 |
9.3.2 | Delisting at the NASDAQ | 39 |
9.4 | Delisting at the London Stock Exchange | 39 |
9.4.1 | Definition of the London Stock Exchange | 39 |
9.4.2 | Delisting at the London Stock Exchange | 40 |
10. | Reporting Issues to the Relevant Authorities | 42 |
10.1 | Deregistration at the Securities and Exchange Commission | 42 |
10.1.1 | Definition of the Securities and Exchange Commission | 42 |
10.1.2 | Deregistration at the Securities and Exchange Commission | 43 |
10.2 | The Financial Services Authority | 46 |
10.2.1 | Definition of the Financial Services Authority | 46 |
10.2.2 | Information to the Financial Services Authority when Going Private | 47 |
10.3 | Secondary Listing | 47 |
10.3.1 | Cancellation of a Secondary Listing at a U.S. Stock Exchange | 48 |
10.3.2 | Cancellation of a Secondary Listing at the London Stock Exchange | 48 |
11. | Fiduciary Duty Issues | 48 |
11.1 | Class Action Securities Litigation | 49 |
11.2 | Entire Fairness | 50 |
11.3 | Duties of Care and Loyalty | 51 |
11.4 | Special Committees | 51 |
11.5 | Hiring of Legal and Financial Advisors | 53 |
11.6 | Revlon Duties | 53 |
11.7 | Summary of Fiduciary Duties | 54 |
12. | Protection of Shareholders | 56 |
12.1 | Protection of Shareholders in the U.S. | 56 |
12.1.1 | Rules against False and Misleading Information | 56 |
12.1.2 | Disclosure Issues | 57 |
12.2 | Information Disclosure in the U.K. | 59 |
13. | The Enron Scandal | 61 |
14. | Limitation | 62 |
15. | Conclusion | 62 |
References | IV |
Founded in 1982 and based in Massachusetts, Webhire Inc. makes Web-based software for companies to manage their hiring processes. Even though the company delivered financial information that showed consecutive quarters of positive cash flows and sales of approximately $14 million, Webhire’s stock was trading at 50 cents on NASDAQ. The company’s main objective to become public was to attract investors, but with a low trading stock price and depressed market cap it was causing exactly the opposite effect. After observing such results and adding annual costs of $400,000, which were necessary to meet stock exchange requirements and comply with all regulations required for public companies, and to pile it up, the new Sarbanes – Oxley regulations passed in the U.S. that would only make this process more time consuming and expensive, executives got tired of venturing in the open market and decided to deregister, this was the company’s first step towards going private. (Prince)
The deregistration process1 was completed in 2003 and the company was able to enjoy the benefits of their decision. Webhire’s CEO Susanne Bowen commented “Not only did we achieve significant cost-savings, but we’ve also had the opportunity to enjoy the positive impact on cash flow and focus our team on what we need to do to grow the business.” (Prince)
Just like this U.S. based company there are many other companies world wide facing different situations and scenarios, which has private companies seriously thinking if an Initial Public Offering or IPO is really that attractive and the best solution for their capital needs as well as public companies, like Webhire Inc., which have decided that the costs of remaining public outweigh the benefits.
Throughout this research paper we intend to explore and understand the background, magnitude and tendencies of this trend, as well as find the key differences in the strategy, process and legal aspects of the going private transaction between the U.S. and U.K.
The first level of the graph shows listed companies which are publicly owned and are traded on different stock exchanges such as the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (NASDAQ), the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the London Stock Exchange (LSE), etc. These firms are called public companies. These companies have a duty to fulfill different financial and reporting requirements of the stock exchanges and controlling institutes like the Securities and Exchange Commission in the U.S. and the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the U.K.
The third level shows companies which have decided to go private. The ownership of private companies becomes concentrated in the hands of a few large stockholders and the stocks are no longer publicly traded or quoted. The reasons and the strategies for companies to go private will be addressed in the following chapters.
Between the first and the third level of the previous graph there are many firms that prefer or are forced to go dark. In this case a company voluntarily withdraws its securities from listing and trading on an exchange or its securities are ceased to be eligible for listing because the company has failed to meet the exchange´s continuing listing requirements. After delisting the company´s securities continue to be traded in the OTC market, which sometimes is also called unlisted market or off-board market.…
Going private in UK and US. Differences and similarities in strategy, process and legal regulations A research about financial markets in the UK and US. It will be very useful if you want to know about going private transactions, strategies, mergers & acquisitions and different financial authorities. The work contains aslo statistical data, graphs and their analysis.
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Pregressive Income Taxation and Fixed Tax Rate System
- Going Private in UK and US. Differences and Similarities in Strategy, Process and Legal Regulations
- Latvian Pension System from 1918 until Today: Evolution, Reforms, Legislation
-
Ты можешь добавить любую работу в список пожеланий. Круто!Advantages and Disadvantages of Pregressive Income Taxation and Fixed Tax Rate System
Реферат для университета8
Оцененный! -
Latvian Pension System from 1918 until Today: Evolution, Reforms, Legislation
Реферат для университета12
-
Portfolio of Stocks Listed at RSE for Resident
Дипломная для университета67
-
Forex Trade
Реферат для университета6
-
Explanation of Economic Terms
Конспект для университета4