This essay aims to clarify and alliterate the differences in the arguments and theories of the alternating scientific procedures expressed by the empiricist philosophers Hume and Popper.
Additionally, I have added the thoughts of Kuhn, a historian of science and of Feyerabend, an extremist philosopher who both provide their own opinions to the nature of science.
Finally, I offer my own humble opinions and answer the above question after talking in depth about the topic of this essay.
To illuminate the essay question:
Does falsification provide an answer to the problems of induction?
Hume…
